Subject: Re: Voting on ISSUE 1.6
From: Kevin Cameron x3251 (Kevin.Cameron@nsc.com)
Date: Thu Nov 21 2002 - 17:47:09 PST
> From: "Swapnajit Mittra" <mittra@juno.com>
>
> This memo contains the list of eligible voters for ISSUE 1.6 and
> the ballot.
>
> o List of eligible voters for ISSUE 1.6 (Andrzej's 17 point proposal)
>
> ----------------------- Ballot --------------------------------------
>
> (0)
> a. YES
> b. YES
> c. YES
> d. OK
>
> (1)
> a. OK
> b. OK
> c. OK - but DirectC is the donation not SV
>
> (2)
> a. YES
> b. YES
>
> (3)
> (i) YES
> (ii) YES
> (iii) YES
> (iv) YES
>
> (4)
> a. NO
> b. NO - same as (a) doesn't seem easily verifiable
> c. YES
>
> (5)
> a. YES
> b. NO, not necessary (C name in extern decl.)
>
> (6)
> a. NO to first sentence
> b. YES
> c. YES
>
> (7) YES
>
> (8) ? - seems incomplete
>
> (9) YES
>
> (10)
> a. NO, should be able to change if copy-by-value
> b. YES
> c. YES
>
> (11) a. YES
> b. YES
> c. YES
> d. Abstain
>
> (12) Abstain
>
> (13) a. YES
> b. YES
>
> (14) No, too broad without considering implementation
>
> (15) NO VOTE ON THIS ITEM - withdrawn.
>
> (16) No as it stands, needs split (2/4-state, and only outer bound unspecified).
>
> (17) No, should be able to return anything C can return. NB the minimum size
of object returned is always an int in C.
> ----------------------- Ballot --------------------------------------
Kev.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Nov 21 2002 - 17:47:45 PST