Re: "scv" and "svc" prefixes


Subject: Re: "scv" and "svc" prefixes
From: Michael Rohleder (michael.rohleder@motorola.com)
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 14:36:23 PST


Hmmm.

As a matter of fact, I don't care, but this argumentation is interesting ...
SystemC also uses sc as prefix. Isn't this also rather near to sv ???
And is sv not also rather similar to scv ???

-Michael

Stuart Swan wrote:

> I agree with Doug's concerns on the use of the "svc"
> prefix. I was absent at the telecon today, but as
> one of the people involved in the SystemC SCV standard
> I think there may be confusion down the road if we stick
> with "svc".
>
> -Stuart
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Warmke, Doug [mailto:doug_warmke@mentorg.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:52 AM
> > To: sv-cc@eda.org
> > Subject: "scv" and "svc" prefixes
> >
> >
> > Team,
> >
> > Regarding using "svc" as a prefix:
> >
> > I know we voted on this already. However, since then,
> > I found out that the SystemC Verification committee has
> > chosen the prefix "scv" for the verification-related
> > calls in SystemC 2.1. "svc" and "scv" are a little
> > too close for comfort.
> >
> > What about we stick with plain "sv" as our prefix?
> > Would it be OK to re-vote on this issue, Swapnajit,
> > in light of this new data?
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Doug
> >
> >

--

NOTE: The content of this message may contain personal views which are not neccessarily the views of Motorola, unless specifically stated.

___________________________________________________ | | _ | Michael Rohleder Tel: +49-89-92103-259 | _ / )| Software Technologist Fax: +49-89-92103-680 |( \ / / | Motorola, Semiconductor Products, System Design | \ \ _( (_ | _ Schatzbogen 7, D-81829 Munich, Germany _ | _) )_ (((\ \>|_/ > < \_|</ /))) (\\\\ \_/ / mailto:Michael.Rohleder@motorola.com \ \_/ ////) \ /_______________________________________________\ / \ _/ \_ / / / \ \

The information contained in this email has been classified as: Motorola General Business Information (x) Motorola Internal Use Only ( ) Motorola Confidential Proprietary ( )

*** This note may contain Motorola Confidential Proprietary or Motorola Internal Use Only Information and is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. Thank you! ***




This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 14:38:18 PST