Subject: Re: "scv" and "svc" prefixes
From: Warmke, Doug (doug_warmke@mentorg.com)
Date: Tue Jan 07 2003 - 16:14:36 PST
Michael,
I think the difference between "sv" and "sc" is much
more apparent than the transpose-only difference
between "svc" and "scv".   Maybe it's just a matter
of taste or sensitivity, but I do think we'd be
better off using only "sv".  Anyways it seems that
all example-writers on our reflector are already
doing that.  Maybe they subconsciously realized that
"sv" is better than "svc" :)
Regards,
Doug
Michael Rohleder wrote:
> Hmmm.
> 
> As a matter of fact, I don't care, but this argumentation is interesting ...
> SystemC also uses sc as prefix. Isn't this also rather near to sv ???
> And is sv not also rather similar to scv ???
> 
> -Michael
> 
> 
> Stuart Swan wrote:
> 
> 
>>I agree with Doug's concerns on the use of the "svc"
>>prefix. I was absent at the telecon today, but as
>>one of the people involved in the SystemC SCV standard
>>I think there may be confusion down the road if we stick
>>with "svc".
>>
>>-Stuart
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Warmke, Doug [mailto:doug_warmke@mentorg.com]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:52 AM
>>>To: sv-cc@eda.org
>>>Subject: "scv" and "svc" prefixes
>>>
>>>
>>>Team,
>>>
>>>Regarding using "svc" as a prefix:
>>>
>>>I know we voted on this already.  However, since then,
>>>I found out that the SystemC Verification committee has
>>>chosen the prefix "scv" for the verification-related
>>>calls in SystemC 2.1.  "svc" and "scv" are a little
>>>too close for comfort.
>>>
>>>What about we stick with plain "sv" as our prefix?
>>>Would it be OK to re-vote on this issue, Swapnajit,
>>>in light of this new data?
>>>
>>>Thanks and regards,
>>>Doug
>>>
>>>
> 
> 
> --
> 
> NOTE: The content of this message may contain personal views
>       which are not neccessarily the views of Motorola, unless specifically stated.
> 
>          ___________________________________________________
>         |                                                   |
>       _ | Michael Rohleder            Tel: +49-89-92103-259 | _
>      / )| Software Technologist       Fax: +49-89-92103-680 |( \
>     / / | Motorola, Semiconductor Products, System Design   | \ \
>   _( (_ |  _   Schatzbogen 7, D-81829 Munich, Germany    _  | _) )_
>  (((\ \>|_/ >                                           < \_|</ /)))
>  (\\\\ \_/ /    mailto:Michael.Rohleder@motorola.com     \ \_/ ////)
>   \       /_______________________________________________\       /
>    \    _/                                                 \_    /
>    /   /                                                     \   \
> 
> The information contained in this email has been classified as:
> Motorola General Business Information (x)
> Motorola Internal Use Only            ( )
> Motorola Confidential Proprietary     ( )
> 
> 
> *** This note may contain Motorola Confidential Proprietary or
>     Motorola Internal Use Only Information and is intended to be
>     reviewed by only the individual or organization named above.
>     If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative
>     of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
>     dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
>     or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
>     this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
>     return email and delete this email from your system.
>     Thank you! ***
> 
> 
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jan 07 2003 - 16:15:34 PST