RE: [sv-cc] Vote/Poll/Review announcement


Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Vote/Poll/Review announcement
From: Francoise Martinolle (fm@cadence.com)
Date: Fri Oct 17 2003 - 16:21:38 PDT


>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org]On Behalf Of
> > Swapnajit Mittra
> > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:46 AM
> > To: sv-cc@eda.org
> > Subject: [sv-cc] Vote/Poll/Review announcement
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This is the ballot for the following poll/vote/review. Please
> > send in your feedback by 10/19/03.
> >
> > o Acceptance vote for Mentor's donation
> >
> > This is a company ***vote***. Following companies are eligible
> > for voting. Only one vote per company will be accepted. Please
> > vote on: 'SV-CC accepts Mentor's donation as the basis for
> > more discussion and work'. The donation is located at:
> > http://www.eda.org/sv-cc/hm/1481.html
> >
> > - Cadence
> > - Mentor
> > - Synopsys
> > - Motorola
>
>Cadence votes NO to this proposal even though I think that it would be
>useful to allow this functionality. The main reason I have is that
>allowing the C code to call a verilog task and suspend the C code
>execution is very complex to implement and there are some issues with
>disable statements. Yes I think it would be nice to call a Verilog task
>but I would rather define it as a callback function so that the C code
>would not suspend and wait for the Verilog task to finish. Instead, the C
>code would tell the simulator to call it back when that a specific task
>instance is completed. The disabling issue would also be solved. If people
>are interested in this idea, I will make a counter proposal to Mentor's
>proposal.

> > o Poll for Ralph's errata
> >
> > This is a technical poll on Ralph's errata as listed at:
> > http://www.eda.org/sv-cc/hm/1487.html
> >
> > Following members are eligible for sending comment (Y/N/A).
> >
> > - Francoise
> > - Ralph
> > - Doug
> > - Michael
> > - Joao
> > - Andrzej
> > - Ghassan
>
>Approved
>
> > o Review (not vote or poll) for LRM-5 and LRM-17
> >
> > The committee has passed these earlier, but in light of the
> > later feedbacks from other teams, here is one more round
> > of review. All are welcome to send technical comments.
> > http://www.eda.org/sv-cc/hm/1502.html
> >
> > --

Approved



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Oct 17 2003 - 16:24:06 PDT