Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Vote/Poll/Review announcement
From: Francoise Martinolle (fm@cadence.com)
Date: Fri Oct 17 2003 - 16:21:38 PDT
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org]On Behalf Of
> > Swapnajit Mittra
> > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:46 AM
> > To: sv-cc@eda.org
> > Subject: [sv-cc] Vote/Poll/Review announcement
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This is the ballot for the following poll/vote/review. Please
> > send in your feedback by 10/19/03.
> >
> > o Acceptance vote for Mentor's donation
> >
> >   This is a company ***vote***. Following companies are eligible
> >   for voting. Only one vote per company will be accepted. Please
> >   vote on: 'SV-CC accepts Mentor's donation as the basis for
> >   more discussion and work'. The donation is located at:
> >   http://www.eda.org/sv-cc/hm/1481.html
> >
> >   - Cadence
> >   - Mentor
> >   - Synopsys
> >   - Motorola
>
>Cadence votes NO to this proposal even though I think that it would be 
>useful to allow this functionality. The main reason I have is that 
>allowing the C code to call a verilog task and suspend the C code 
>execution is very complex to implement and there are some issues with 
>disable statements. Yes I think it would be nice to call a Verilog task 
>but I would rather define it as a callback function so that the C code 
>would not suspend and wait for the Verilog task to finish. Instead, the C 
>code would tell the simulator to call it back when that a specific task 
>instance is completed. The disabling issue would also be solved. If people 
>are interested in this idea, I will make a counter proposal to Mentor's 
>proposal.
> > o Poll for Ralph's errata
> >
> >   This is a technical poll on Ralph's errata as listed at:
> >   http://www.eda.org/sv-cc/hm/1487.html
> >
> >   Following members are eligible for sending comment (Y/N/A).
> >
> >   - Francoise
> >   - Ralph
> >   - Doug
> >   - Michael
> >   - Joao
> >   - Andrzej
> >   - Ghassan
>
>Approved
>
> > o Review (not vote or poll) for LRM-5 and LRM-17
> >
> >   The committee has passed these earlier, but in light of the
> >   later feedbacks from other teams, here is one more round
> >   of review. All are welcome to send technical comments.
> >   http://www.eda.org/sv-cc/hm/1502.html
> >
> > --
Approved
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Oct 17 2003 - 16:24:06 PDT