Joao,
Please take a look into this. If this is a mistake, we need
to add this to our list of errata.
-- Swapnajit Mittra -- Francoise Martinolle <fm@cadence.com> wrote: I just downloaded the LRM pointed by the accellera web site: http://www.eda.org/sv/SystemVerilog_3.1a.pdf and vpi_create has only 3 arguments and not 4. Bassam, Joao, do you remember if we dropped this from the final spec? Francoise ' At 11:50 AM 5/26/2004 -0700, David W. Smith wrote: >Have you looked at the 3.1a approved standard as well? Not sure which >draft you looked at but it has been superceeded by the >Accellera approved standard at this point. > >Regards >David > >David W. Smith >Synopsys Scientist > >Synopsys, Inc. >Synopsys Technology Park >2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road >Hillsboro, OR 97124 > >Voice: 503.547.6467 >Main: 503.547.6000 >FAX: 503.547.6906 >Email: david.smith@synopsys.com >http://www.synopsys.com > > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of >Francoise Martinolle >Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 12:52 PM >To: sv-cc@eda.org >Subject: [sv-cc] vpi_create > >I looked at the 3.1A draft and I noticed that vpi_create only takes 3 >arguments. >Did we drop the capability of specifying an iteration relationship and a >reference handle to add all the iteration elements to the collection in one >vpi_create call? > >Francoise > ' ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!Received on Thu May 27 09:14:59 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 27 2004 - 09:15:12 PDT