Re: [sv-cc] ptf-passed issues

Charles,

PTF 605 and 622 are still listed in the OPEN state.

Shalom

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com wrote:

> No. They were not passed by VSG.
> In database, they still appear in proposal state, as far as I know,
> not in PTF-passed state.
>
> Shalom
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Charles Dawson wrote:
>
> > Hi Shalom,
> >
> > Does this mean they were added to the LRM or no?
> >
> > -Chas
> >
> >
> > Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com wrote:
> > > I found the following from PTF meeting minutes:
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:40:26 -0400
> > > From: Charles Dawson <chas@cadence.com>
> > > To: PTF <ptf@boyd.com>
> > > Subject: PTF meeting minutes for 8/23/2004
> > >
> > > 4. Discussed new business:
> > >
> > > - PTF 530
> > > Chas commented that it looked good to him. Francoise
> > > had comments, but they look like they've been resolved.
> > > Francoise wanted to know if we should specify the order
> > > that the arguments to the timing check should be returned.
> > > Chas commented that there are other areas, such as ports
> > > and args to systfs where we do not specify the order, yet
> > > the order is pretty obvious (and therefore has not been a
> > > problem). Francoise took an action to add a new PTF item
> > > on to decide on what to do about the order issue.
> > >
> > > PASSED
> > >
> > > - Francoise to file PTF item on vpi_control() issue.
> > > Filed PTF 605. Discussed. Chas brought up that the wording
> > > in 27.3 on vpi_control() was not completely accurate.
> > > Francoise's proposed change was dependent on this inaccuracy.
> > > Francoise was concerned that if someone later fixed the
> > > inaccuracy, her change here would be invalidated. The
> > > consensus was that the inaccuracy was not critical, and should
> > > therefore not be fixed.
> > >
> > > PASSED.
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:05:32 -0400
> > > From: Charles Dawson <chas@cadence.com>
> > > To: PTF <ptf@boyd.com>
> > > Subject: PTF meeting minutes for 9/20/2004
> > >
> > > 4. Discussed new business:
> > >
> > > - PTF 622
> > >
> > > JimV/Steve. PTF 622 PASSED as proposed. Chas will work with
> > > JimV to get the database updated with the proposal. Everyone
> > > will read the proposal to make sure it is the same as what
> > > we discussed.
> > >
> > > - PTF 623
> > >
> > > JimV had made a proposal for PTF 530 which solved the same
> > > problem in diagram 26.6.17. Chas made a proposal and sent
> > > a diagram that illustrates the change.
> > >
> > > JimV/JimG PASSED as proposed
> > >
> > > - PTF 329
> > >
> > > Chas had tried it and it works okay in NCV. Tapati will try
> > > with her simulators. JimG/JimV. PASSED.

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary