RE: [sv-cc] SV-CC Meeting minutes for 11/03/2004

 
Thanks Shalom. This is indeed issue 547.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 3:32 AM
To: SV-CC
Subject: Re: [sv-cc] SV-CC Meeting minutes for 11/03/2004

> - Francoise reported that the SV-BC has accepted a 1364 change
> that will result in some expressions not having a value. This will
> require a chance to vpi_get_value(). Francoise took an action
> to find the Item number.

I believe the intent here was to BTF issue 547.

It was accepted by BTF, not by SV-BC.
It is currently under review by the SV Champions.

BTF 547 allows replications with a zero replication constant.
The effect is to treat such a replication as though it does not exist.
Therefore, it is legal only within a concatenation in which at least one of
the operands has a width larger than zero.

This is the #1 limitation of Verilog that I have to deal with on a
day-to-day basis.

Thanks,
Shalom

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary