[sv-cc] Commenets on proposal for #158

Michael,

Since you don't have red and blue marks in the proposal for #158, we
may have to negotiate with Stu or the champions about it.

I like the idea of leaving some extra numbers between groups.

Some notes:

1) vpiVarBitVar has been changed to vpiVarBit (Issue #44). Should we
cross-reference that issue?

2) In Clause 31, "typespec" is one word, and so should be a single word
here too.

3) Issue #123 changed vpiMemberTypespec to vpiTypespecMember. Another
cross-reference?

4) We need to coordinate these changes with Bassam's changes to
assertion-related #define's, as in Issue #265. Francoise (and perhaps
others) had some concerns about #265 in its present form.

5) In #266, Bassam has proposed deleting vpiSequenceSpec.

6) Under "generic object properties", a comment says that "NOTE: Object
value range re-started at 600 ..." I found this confusing, since the
numbers now apply to properties rather than objects. Since the
vpi_user.h does the same restarting without having a comment, users
probably don't really need the comment, so I recommend leaving it out.

7) Should one move the definitions for vpiNullConst through vpiDivDist
back up in the list so that the numbers come in sequence? Sometimes
when I'm debugging, I find a number and have to look up the
corresponding identifier, so moving it up would make that easier.

8) The symbols (and semantics) of wild equality have changed (Issue
#213), so we'll eventually have to change the symbols in the comments
for vpiWildEqOp and vpiWildNeqOp. But that'll have to be a new
erratum.

Regards,
Jim V.

---------------------------------------------------------
James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381
Engineering Director (FAX) 978-262-6636
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com
270 Billerica Rd
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
"We all work with partial information."
----------------------------------------------------------
  
 

] -----Original Message-----
] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On
] Behalf Of Michael Rohleder
] Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 2:48 PM
] To: SystemVerilog CC DWG
] Subject: [sv-cc] Proposals for #63, #158
]
] Hi,
] - I believe the updates of Jim for #301 have rendered most of
] the errata
] #63 superfluous, (Francoise could you please verify this).
] A proposal has been uploaded to repair the contradicting note #11.
] - A proposal is now available for #158.
] - I have further added a new errata #330 for applying #288 to
] #205 as we
] have discussed in our latest confenence call.
] A proposal has been added to this errata. Please review
] for tomorrows
] conference call.
]
] Best regards,
] -Michael
]
] --
]
] NOTE: The content of this message may contain personal views
] which are not neccessarily the views of Freescale,
] unless specifically stated.
]
] ___________________________________________________
] | |
] _ | Michael Rohleder Tel: +49-89-92103-259 | _
] / )| Freescale Semiconductor Fax: +49-89-92103-680 |( \
] / / | Freescale Halbleiter Deutschland GmbH | \ \
] _( (_ | _ Schatzbogen 7, D-81829 Munich, Germany _ | _) )_
] (((\ \>|_/ > < \_|</ /)))
] (\\\\ \_/ / mailto:Michael.Rohleder@freescale.com \ \_/ ////)
] \ /_______________________________________________\ /
] \ _/ \_ /
] / / \ \
]
] The information contained in this email has been classified as:
] General Business Information ( )
] Freescale Internal Use Only ( )
] Freescale Confidential Proprietary ( )
]
]
] *** This note may contain Freescale Confidential Proprietary
] or Freescale Internal Use Only Information and is intended to
] be reviewed by only the individual or organization named
] above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
] representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby
] notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this
] email and its attachments, if any, or the information
] contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this
] email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
] return email and delete this email from your system.
] Thank you! ***
]
]
]
]
]
Received on Tue Nov 30 13:18:23 2004