RE: [sv-cc] Joint proposal for SV-CC #50 ready for review

Doug, I didn't have time to absorb everything, but
I would pass on a few nits:

In productions for dpi_spec_string, use "straight quotes"
instead of "smart quotes".

In new E.12.1, remove extra space from "implementation' s".

In new E.11.5, I think you want to change the function names
as well for consistency with the new non-deprecated functions
in Annex F.

Regards,
Jim V.

---------------------------------------------------------
James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381
Engineering Director (FAX) 978-262-6636
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com
270 Billerica Rd
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
"We all work with partial information."
----------------------------------------------------------
  
 

] -----Original Message-----
] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On
] Behalf Of Warmke, Doug
] Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:46 AM
] To: sv-cc@eda.org
] Subject: [sv-cc] Joint proposal for SV-CC #50 ready for review
]
] Hello SV-CC,
]
] We had our scheduled meeting at 2pm EST today to develop and
] review the group's response to item #50. Joao, Francoise,
] Bassam, and Doug attended.
]
] Doug presented a draft revision of an amended proposal
] for item #50. The proposal takes into account all issues
] raised by Synopsys and presented by Oz.
]
] The proposal also develops the interface along the lines
] agreed in this week's meeting, i.e. to remove the opaque
] handles and the vendor-specific type representations that
] are used in association with 2-state and 4-state arguments.
]
] The proposal has been reviewed in depth by the four of us
] and we are basically happy with it. I've attached it here
] to get a broader group review.
]
] Please look over the document and respond with any suggestions
] for improvement. I'll try to incorporate all suggestions into
] a next revision of the document.
]
] Thanks and regards,
] Doug
]
]
Received on Fri Dec 10 07:21:33 2004