[sv-cc] Yet another updated proposal for types on wires

I have updated 333 with yet another version of the
proposal. It appears now that Michael's comment about
the risk of not catching everything was correct.

I have

-- moved array net inside "nets" so that a struct net
can contain an array net as a member

-- removed the "vpiIsPacked" property since it is the
inverse of the "vpiVector" property for struct nets.
I.e., one doesn't really need it. If someone objects,
I can put this back, but I noticed that we didn't
need it for variables either. (I am assuming that
we agree with Francoise that all packed struct nets
have vpiVector = TRUE.)

-- Added a note to say that array nets and unpacked
struct nets do not have a value property.

Once Francoise and Jim G. reword Proposal #64, I will
update this proposal one more time to agree with it.

Regards,
Jim Vellenga

---------------------------------------------------------
James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381
Engineering Director (FAX) 978-262-6636
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com
270 Billerica Rd
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
"We all work with partial information."
----------------------------------------------------------
  
Received on Fri Dec 10 10:43:58 2004