Re: [sv-cc] updloaded draft d2 of errata 77

I guess I was looking at the previous version or something.

The err77-d2.pdf seems to be very different then what I was
looking at.

Sorry for the confusion.

--Jim G.

Francoise Martinolle wrote:

> I don't see what you are pointing out. Is it possible that you were
> reading the previous version:
> err77.pdf and not err77-d2.pdf?
> Francoise
> '
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Jim Garnett
> *Sent:* Monday, December 20, 2004 5:48 PM
> *To:* Francoise Martinolle
> *Cc:* 'SV-CC'
> *Subject:* Re: [sv-cc] updloaded draft d2 of errata 77
>
> Francoise,
>
> There seems to be a small error in the 77 proposal.
>
> The following is what you have:
>
> 31.16 IO Declaration (supersedes ...)
>
> Diagram 31.10 (variables diagram)
>
> Remove
> ...
>
> and I believe it should be
>
> 31.16 IO Declaration (supersedes ...)
>
> Diagram 31.16 (io decl diagram)
>
> Remove
> ...
>
> It looks like it was a simple cut and paste type issue.
>
> --Jim Garnett
>
>
> Francoise Martinolle wrote:
>
>> This is 77 minus the changes already made in 53.
>>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Dec 20 17:56:16 2004