This does not help much.
It still means all the chapter numbers that people have been used to for
years are going to change. It's also going to make some of the PTF deprecation
text look funny: for example, do we say that Clauses 21-25 were omitted
(2001 numbering) or 22-26 (2005 numbering)?
The only suggestion I have is to fold 1364 clause 11 into 10, which will
save the numbering of 12 and on.
-- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com Design & Verification Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 5441478 [ ]Freescale Internal Use Only [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 17:20:24 -0500 From: n.humenick@ieee.org To: stuart@sutherland-hdl.com, m.d.turner@ieee.org Cc: Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com, Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM, tom_fitzpatrick@mentorg.com, chas@cadence.com, johny.srouji@intel.com Subject: RE: references, bibliography Stu: I defer to your project editor... Michelle: With due deference given to the time constraints of this project, is making the references Clause 2 a requirement for the development stages of the document or can this be clause 1.2 in the draft, and Clause 2 in the final publication? Thanks, Noelle -- Noelle D. Humenick Coordinating Program Manager IEEE Standards n.humenick@ieee.org PH: +1 732 562 3818; FX: +1 732 562 1571 http://standards.ieee.org/ The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 445 Hoes Lane, PO Box 1331, Piscataway, NJ 08855-1331 USA *************************************** ----- Forwarded by Noelle Humenick/STDS/STAFF/US/IEEE on 01/10/2005 05:15 PM ----- "Stuart Sutherland" To: <Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com>, <n.humenick@ieee.org>, <stuart@sutherlan <Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM>, "'Fitzpatrick, Tom'" <tom_fitzpatrick@mentorg.com> d-hdl.com> cc: <chas@cadence.com>, <johny.srouji@intel.com> Subject: RE: references, bibliography 01/10/2005 11:40 AM Please respond to stuart All, I was just dealing with this same problem this weekend, as I re-wrote the intro and overview of the P1800 LRM to meet the IEEE document guidelines. Adding the "normative references" section per the IEEE guideline would re-number all of the LRM sections. For the P1800 manual, this renumbering would impact the standard in two ways: A) The hundreds of change order descriptions would refer to the wrong clause numbers. Since I now have all of the changes made except about 30 changes that are all to the same section (VPI diagrams), renumbering is not going to confuse the editing process. However, it would be confusing to those that have to review the editing. B) The P1800 LRM contains several dozen, perhaps more than 100, cross references to the 1364 LRM. These cross references are not automatic links, because they are to a different document. If the LRM sections are renumbered, it would be a manual process to find and change all of the references in the P1800 LRM. There is a risk of missing some. For the moment, in the P1800 LRM, I have added the "normative references" as the last subclause in the overview clause, Clause 1. This places it in the same place as if it were Clause 2, but does not renumber the remaining clauses. The real question (for you, Noelle) is whether the IEEE guideline for a "Clause 2 Normative References" is a requirement or a recommendation. Is making this a subclause of Clause 1 sufficient to meet the IEEE requirements? Note that the IEEE documentation guideline does say that a document might not have a "normative references" clause at all, but that is not the question here. Both the 1364 and 1800 LRMs do reference other standards, and need this info as either a clause or subclause. Stu ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Stuart Sutherland stuart@sutherland-hdl.com +1-503-692-0898 > -----Original Message----- > From: shalom@fil.ea.freescale.net > [mailto:shalom@fil.ea.freescale.net] On Behalf Of > Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com > Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 3:19 AM > To: n.humenick@ieee.org; Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM; Stuart > Sutherland; 'Fitzpatrick, Tom' > Cc: chas@cadence.com; johny.srouji@intel.com > Subject: Re: references, bibliography > > Probably we also need to put 1364-2001 Version C in the > References or in the Bibliography, at least for the sake of > the deprecated PLI clauses. > > Noelle, what is the official IEEE Standards meaning of the > term "deprecation"? I can't find it at the moment. > I want to be sure we are using the term correctly. > > Thanks, > Shalom > > -- > Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker > @freescale.com > Design & Verification Methodology Tel: > +972 9 9522268 > Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: > +972 9 9522890 > POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: > +972 50 5441478 > > [ ]Freescale Internal Use Only [ ]Freescale Confidential > Proprietary > > > >Received on Mon Jan 10 20:15:16 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 10 2005 - 20:15:18 PST