In addition, maybe Clause 5 (Scheduling) could be moved to before Clause 12.
Then Clauses 2-4 would move to 3-5, 5 would move to be 11, 6-10 would stay the
same, and 11 would be attached to 10.
Shalom
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com wrote:
> This does not help much.
> It still means all the chapter numbers that people have been used to for
> years are going to change. It's also going to make some of the PTF deprecation
> text look funny: for example, do we say that Clauses 21-25 were omitted
> (2001 numbering) or 22-26 (2005 numbering)?
>
> The only suggestion I have is to fold 1364 clause 11 into 10, which will
> save the numbering of 12 and on.
>
>
-- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com Design & Verification Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 5441478 [ ]Freescale Internal Use Only [ ]Freescale Confidential ProprietaryReceived on Mon Jan 10 23:30:39 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 10 2005 - 23:30:41 PST