[sv-cc] Re: questions on SV-CC 313/PTF 296

Also,

I just noticed that new Generates diagram has enclosure "memory".
PTF 341 changed these to "reg array" with vpiMemory label.
Do the same here?

Thanks,
Shalom

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com wrote:

> Is it important that the Generates diagram follow 26.6.2?
> It causes all the following diagrams to be renumbered.
> That is not a problem for me, since all the internal 1364 cross-references
> are automatically updated, but it's a lot of work for Stu Sutherland to
> fix the references from the 1800 doc to the 1364 doc (assuming he did
> not already change them), it messes up the references in the data bases,
> and some people are already used to the current numbering.
>
> Could Generates be put at the end instead?
>
> Thanks,
> Shalom
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Charles Dawson wrote:
>
> > > SV-CC 313/PTF 296:
> > >
> > > The proposal says,
> > >
> > > "Add the following section after 26.6.2:
> > >
> > > 26.6.2' Generates"
> > >
> > > I don't understand what to do with a sub-clause number " 26.6.2' ".
> > >
> > The new section needs to go between 26.6.2 and 26.6.3. I did not
> > know what to call it, so I called it 26.6.2 prime. At the end, I
> > think all the sections after 26.6.2 will need to be renumbered.
>
>

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary