RE: [sv-cc] Need clarification on erratum 62

 Note 2 of 32.10 should be modified as per errata 62.
Errata 62 takes precedence over errata 63. You don't have to implement 63
because
62 provides a much better modification.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Stuart
Sutherland
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 11:17 AM
To: sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: [sv-cc] Need clarification on erratum 62

Chas., or someone on the CC committee.

I need some clarification on two of the many changes covered in Mantis
erratum #62:

Errata 62 and 301 both change note 2 of 31.10. If I understand correctly,
62 completely replaces the changes made by 301. Is this correct?

Errata 62 and 63 change note 11 of 3.10 in very different ways. Which
erratum takes precedence over the other, or should they be combined? If
combined, then how?

A prompt response to these is appreciated.

Thanks,

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898
 
Received on Tue Jan 11 09:49:28 2005