Re: [sv-cc] Need clarification on erratum 62

Agreed.
I think it was an oversight not to declare errata 62 as a duplicate of
63 when we did the most recent modifications here.

-Michael

Francoise Martinolle wrote:

> Note 2 of 32.10 should be modified as per errata 62.
>Errata 62 takes precedence over errata 63. You don't have to implement 63
>because
>62 provides a much better modification.
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Stuart
>Sutherland
>Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 11:17 AM
>To: sv-cc@eda.org
>Subject: [sv-cc] Need clarification on erratum 62
>
>Chas., or someone on the CC committee.
>
>I need some clarification on two of the many changes covered in Mantis
>erratum #62:
>
>Errata 62 and 301 both change note 2 of 31.10. If I understand correctly,
>62 completely replaces the changes made by 301. Is this correct?
>
>
>Errata 62 and 63 change note 11 of 3.10 in very different ways. Which
>erratum takes precedence over the other, or should they be combined? If
>combined, then how?
>
>A prompt response to these is appreciated.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Stu
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>Stuart Sutherland
>stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
>+1-503-692-0898
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
NOTE: The content of this message may contain personal views 
      which are not neccessarily the views of Freescale, unless specifically stated.
 
         ___________________________________________________
        |                                                   |
      _ | Michael Rohleder            Tel: +49-89-92103-259 | _
     / )| Freescale Semiconductor     Fax: +49-89-92103-680 |( \
    / / |      Freescale Halbleiter Deutschland GmbH        | \ \
  _( (_ |  _   Schatzbogen 7, D-81829 Munich, Germany    _  | _) )_
 (((\ \>|_/ >                                           < \_|</ /)))
 (\\\\ \_/ /    mailto:Michael.Rohleder@freescale.com     \ \_/ ////)
  \       /_______________________________________________\       /
   \    _/                                                 \_    /
   /   /                                                     \   \
The information contained in this email has been classified as:
General Business Information                     ( )
Freescale Internal Use Only         ( )
Freescale Confidential Proprietary  ( )
*** This note may contain Freescale Confidential Proprietary or Freescale Internal Use Only Information and is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. 
    Thank you! ***