Re: [Fwd: [sv-cc] Schedule and process for reviewing incorporated Items]

Maybe moving a non-new item to new is an illegal transition.

Shalom

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, Charles Dawson wrote:

> Hi Karen,
>
> For some reason, the mantis data base is not allowing me to do 6.1.2
> as described below. I set the status to "new" and it puts it into
> "assigned".
>
> -Chas
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [sv-cc] Schedule and process for reviewing incorporated Items
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:51:14 -0500
> From: Charles Dawson <chas>
> Reply-To: chas
> To: SV-CC <sv-cc@eda.org>
>
> Hi All,
>
> According to the last schedule that I have, we need to have all of our Items
> that have been incorporated into the latest draft reviewed by Feb 3, 2005.
> Please plan accordingly. Below I have extracted the instructions Karen
> published for this phase of the operation:
>
> 6. LRM Review by the SV-* Committees
> 1. Once an issue has status:acknowledged, the appropriate SV-* committee must
> review the changes for correctness
> 1. If the change is correct, the issue is moved to status:closed
> 2. If the change is not correct and the description was correct, the issue is
> moved to category:SV-LRM and status:new, and mail is sent to the LRM team
> 3. If the change is not correct and the description of the change needs to be
> modified, the issue is changed to status:assigned
>
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.
>
> -Chas
>
>
>

-- 
Shalom Bresticker                        Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com
Design & Verification Methodology                    Tel: +972 9  9522268
Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd.                 Fax: +972 9  9522890
POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL                     Cell: +972 50 5441478
  
[ ]Freescale Internal Use Only      [ ]Freescale Confidential Proprietary