Hi All, I added a proposal to #431. I've kept the distinction between system control and assertion control as in the current LRM and updated the system control mechanism to mimic the assertion control system tasks ($asserton/off/kill) by: a) Correcting the naming of the tasks and enhancing with an additional "kill" control constant a) Allowing a scope handle or alternatively a handle to a collection of scopes as a second argument (NULL of course means all assertions). I believe this approach addresses the issues raised in our previous discussions and leaves room for future expansion of both the system and assertion control means. Thx. -Bassam. -- Dr. Bassam Tabbara Architect, R&D Novas Software Inc. (408) 467-7893Received on Thu Apr 14 21:44:26 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 14 2005 - 21:44:33 PDT