RE: [sv-cc] uploaded proposal for 489 with fixes from previous meeting

From: Francoise Martinolle <fm_at_.....>
Date: Tue May 03 2005 - 20:15:41 PDT
That note is meant to indicate that interface port and mod ports io decls
have no defined
direction.
How can I say this better than what I wrote?

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Vellenga [mailto:vellenga] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:03 PM
To: Francoise Martinolle; sv-cc@eda.org
Subject: RE: [sv-cc] uploaded proposal for 489 with fixes from previous
meeting

Francoise,

I couldn't understand the new Note 3 on "32.10 IO Declaration".

Regards,
Jim V.

--------------------------------------------------------- 
James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
Engineering Director                   (FAX) 978-262-6636 
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
270 Billerica Rd
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
"We all work with partial information." 
---------------------------------------------------------- 
  
 

] -----Original Message-----
] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On 
] Behalf Of Francoise Martinolle
] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 12:37 PM
] To: sv-cc@eda.org
] Subject: [sv-cc] uploaded proposal for 489 with fixes from 
] previous meeting
] 
]  
] 
Received on Tue May 3 20:15:46 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 03 2005 - 20:15:53 PDT