RE: [sv-cc] Item 536 and a general request

From: Tapati Basu <Tapati.Basu_at_.....>
Date: Mon May 09 2005 - 11:01:04 PDT
Yes, it needs a revote.

- Tapati
>X-Authentication-Warning: server.eda.org: majordom set sender to 
owner-sv-cc@eda.org using -f
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Item 536 and a general request
>Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 13:54:29 -0400
>Thread-Topic: [sv-cc] Item 536 and a general request
>Thread-Index: AcVTSiE9AOz93NHrT1C+NOvh2UUSjABdfWDg
>From: "Jim Vellenga" <vellenga@cadence.com>
>To: "Charlie Dawson" <chas@cadence.com>, "SV-CC" <sv-cc@eda.org>
>X-Received: By mailgate2.Cadence.COM as KAA12394 at Mon May  9 10:51:58 2005
>X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/873/Mon May  9 09:36:51 2005 on server.eda.org
>X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/873/Mon May  9 09:36:51 2005 on server.eda.org
>X-Virus-Status: Clean
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.eda.org id 
j49HsV4Y020014
>X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0232 C:98.7678 )
>
>Chas,
>
>I believe that 606 has a new proposal and therefore
>requires a revote.
>
>Regards,
>Jim V.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------- 
>James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
>Engineering Director                   (FAX) 978-262-6636 
>Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
>270 Billerica Rd 
>Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 
>"We all work with partial information." 
>---------------------------------------------------------- 
>  
> 
>
>] -----Original Message-----
>] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On 
>] Behalf Of Charlie Dawson
>] Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2005 5:17 PM
>] To: SV-CC
>] Subject: [sv-cc] Item 536 and a general request
>] 
>] Hi All,
>] 
>] I just noticed that it looks like we passed Item 536 on 4/8 and
>] I failed to update the database properly.  No other meeting minutes
>] talk about this particular item, so I think it was just an oversight
>] on my part.  If anyone recalls otherwise, please let me know.
>] 
>] Given that I am human, it is possible there are other similar 
>] mistakes.
>] So, please take a minute or two and look over the Items that 
>] are assigned
>] to you.  If an Item:
>] 
>]    - Has a proposal but is not on the agenda for Tuesday
>]    - Was previously resolved and Mantis does not reflect the 
>] resolution
>]    - has some other problem
>] 
>] please let me know.  Thanks.
>] 
>]    -Chas
>] 
>] -- 
>] Charles Dawson
>] Senior Engineering Manager
>] NC-Verilog Team
>] Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
>] 270 Billerica Road
>] Chelmsford, MA  01824
>] (978) 262 - 6273
>] chas@cadence.com
>] 
>] 
>] 
>] 

Tapati Basu
Received on Mon May 9 11:01:17 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 09 2005 - 11:01:20 PDT