[sv-cc] Re: A couple of comments on 345

> In 26.3.8, there seems to be a stray word "comp".

Courtesy of typing with the wrong window active. Fixed.

> In the same section, the note talks about "by direct
> lookup".  As far as I can tell, this is a phrase that
> is new to 1364.  Does it mean via vpi_handle_by_name?
> If so, perhaps it would be simpler to say "through
> object relationships or via vpi_handle_by_name."

Object relationships cover handles retrieved via vpi_handle()
and vpi_iterate()/vpi_scan(). Direct lookup is intended to
cover the remaining methods:

    vpi_handle_by_name()
    vpi_handle_by_index()
    vpi_handle_by_multi_index()
    vpi_handle_multi()

> Also, in the same note, would Stu prefer the use of
> "can" rather than "may"?

He "may", and I "can" fix it simply enough given a preference. :-)

/sjd