[sv-cc] 606 and 496

Uploaded the .pdf version also. 

- Thanks,
Tapati 

>X-Authentication-Warning: server.eda.org: majordom set sender to 
owner-sv-cc@eda.org using -f
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0
>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Subject: [sv-cc] A couple of comments on 345
>Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 15:35:04 -0400
>Thread-Topic: A couple of comments on 345
>Thread-Index: AcVUzjLfiUO7413xQX6VkTZHEHjhwQ==
>From: "Jim Vellenga" <vellenga@cadence.com>
>To: "Steven Dovich" <dovich@cadence.com>, "SV-CC" <sv-cc@eda.org>
>X-Received: By mailgate2.Cadence.COM as MAA18705 at Mon May  9 12:32:33 2005
>X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/873/Mon May  9 09:36:51 2005 on server.eda.org
>X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/873/Mon May  9 09:36:51 2005 on server.eda.org
>X-Virus-Status: Clean
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.eda.org id 
j49JZ74Y021043
>X-pstn-levels: (S:99.90000/99.90000 R:95.9108 P:95.9108 M:97.0232 C:98.7678 )
>
>In 26.3.8, there seems to be a stray word "comp".
>
>In the same section, the note talks about "by direct
>lookup".  As far as I can tell, this is a phrase that
>is new to 1364.  Does it mean via vpi_handle_by_name?
>If so, perhaps it would be simpler to say "through
>object relationships or via vpi_handle_by_name."
>
>Also, in the same note, would Stu prefer the use of
>"can" rather than "may"?
>
>Regards,
>Jim V.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------- 
>James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
>Engineering Director                   (FAX) 978-262-6636 
>Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
>270 Billerica Rd 
>Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 
>"We all work with partial information." 
>---------------------------------------------------------- 
>  

Tapati Basu