1364-2005 and 1800-2005 already both refer to both 1364-1995 and 1364-2001. Shalom > A separate interesting question is: Will IEEE let us get > away with referring to previous versions of the standard > within the current version? That is, dare we specify > the use of strings such as "1364-1995" or "1364-2001" > in a 2008 standard? Does IEEE have rules against referring > to previous versions, as this may imply that the current > version is not really the sole standard? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jan 16 07:50:15 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 16 2007 - 07:50:26 PST