RE: [sv-cc] Change "P1800-2005" in Annex F and G?

Ah, yes.  I see, for example, that they're used together
with the `begin-keywords directive, so they're not even
limited to referring to deprecated constructs.  So
there's definitely no problem in using them.

Thank you.

Jim

--------------------------------------------------------- 
James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
Engineering Director                   (FAX) 978-262-6636 
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
270 Billerica Rd
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
"We all work with partial information." 
----------------------------------------------------------  

]-----Original Message-----
]From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com] 
]Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 10:49 AM
]To: Jim Vellenga; stuart@sutherland-hdl.com; sv-cc@eda.org
]Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Change "P1800-2005" in Annex F and G?
]
]1364-2005 and 1800-2005 already both refer to both 1364-1995 and
]1364-2001.
]
]Shalom
]
]
]> A separate interesting question is:  Will IEEE let us get
]> away with referring to previous versions of the standard
]> within the current version?  That is, dare we specify
]> the use of strings such as "1364-1995" or "1364-2001"
]> in a 2008 standard?  Does IEEE have rules against referring
]> to previous versions, as this may imply that the current
]> version is not really the sole standard?
]

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.