RE: [sv-cc] Minor correction to vpiParent_std.pdf proposal for Mantis #1684

Indeed.  We may even want to use a "breadth before depth" 
process here- something like "cut and continue" on a
critical item subset, so we defer the complex issue
discussion to offline emails.  This way, we move forward
more predictably (perhaps).  I think Charlie often
does this informally, but maybe its time to formalize
the process just a bit further.

Also, in retrospect, I should have introduced my topic by
email beforehand to seed our thinking about it- not that
it would necessarily have shortened our need for discussion,
but perhaps it could be at a higher level or more efficient
in the meeting context.
-CB

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Vellenga 
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 4:55 PM
To: Chuck Berking; sv-cc@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Minor correction to vpiParent_std.pdf proposal for
Mantis #1684

Actually, I'm wondering if we should in general do
continuing business before new business.  New business
is tending to take up whole meetings and to prevent
us from finishing things up.

A lot of other organizations I've been part of do
put "Old Business" ahead of "New Business," probably
for just this reason.

Regards,
Jim V.

--------------------------------------------------------- 
James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
Engineering Director                   (FAX) 978-262-6636 
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
270 Billerica Rd
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
"We all work with partial information." 
----------------------------------------------------------  

]-----Original Message-----
]From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On 
]Behalf Of Chuck Berking
]Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 4:38 PM
]To: sv-cc@eda-stds.org
]Subject: [sv-cc] Minor correction to vpiParent_std.pdf 
]proposal for Mantis #1684
]
]FYI- I have made a minor correction to the proposed
]"vpiParent_std.pdf" solution to Mantis item #1684 as follows:
]
]In 27.13 "Nets" detail "ab", paragraph 3 lead sentence:
]
]  "For a variable object with prefix objects, ..."
] 
].. is replaced by:
]
]  "For a net object with prefix objects, ..."
]
]Jim/Charlie-
]Can we possibly arrange to vote on this proposal *before*
]taking up the "Action items" next time, i.e. shift this agenda
]item ahead of "Action items" for next meeting ?
]Thanks,
]Chuck
]
]-- 
]This message has been scanned for viruses and
]dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
]believed to be clean.
]
]
]

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.