RE: [sv-cc] vpiConcatOp and Mantis 1702

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker_at_.....>
Date: Mon Nov 19 2007 - 07:29:20 PST
My understanding is that CC can do whatever is needed to support BC and
EC changes.
That is why they got an extra month. On the other hand, if something is
needed to support AC changes, it has to be coordinated in parallel.

Shalom
 

> Indeed.  I assume that CC, like BC and EC, is now unable to 
> open new Mantis items?  So presumably this would need to be 
> folded into the current 1702 proposal somehow.  As I said, 
> I'll need some help with this.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Nov 19 07:29:41 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 19 2007 - 07:29:44 PST