Re: [sv-cc] vpiConcatOp and Mantis 1702

From: Charlie Dawson <chas_at_.....>
Date: Mon Nov 19 2007 - 07:35:14 PST
Shalom is right.

   -Chas


Bresticker, Shalom wrote:
> My understanding is that CC can do whatever is needed to support BC and
> EC changes.
> That is why they got an extra month. On the other hand, if something is
> needed to support AC changes, it has to be coordinated in parallel.
> 
> Shalom
>  
> 
> 
>>Indeed.  I assume that CC, like BC and EC, is now unable to 
>>open new Mantis items?  So presumably this would need to be 
>>folded into the current 1702 proposal somehow.  As I said, 
>>I'll need some help with this.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
> 
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> 


-- 
Charles Dawson
Senior Engineering Manager
NC-Verilog Team
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
270 Billerica Road
Chelmsford, MA  01824
(978) 262 - 6273
chas@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Nov 19 07:35:59 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 19 2007 - 07:36:04 PST