I have attached a modified version of this proposal. The changes are a numbering clarification for the two section 36.9s,. a new picture for the second 36.9 (now temporarily 36.9b), and a new modification for the picture in 36.51. I also got a clarification about the fact that we use a 'checker' bubble for both declarations and instantiations: apparently this *is* normal for the VPI diagrams, and the recommendation was that we do not create a new 'checker inst' bubble. An SV-CC member (Abby?) took the AR to review this modified version from the SV-CC's point of view and send any comments; I'll try to get it approved at the next SV-CC meeting. Meanwhile, fellow SV-AC members (and other SV-CC people), feel free to look & send further comments too! Also, as usual with these resolved tkts, I'll need someone with permissions to upload this version to Mantis. BTW-- At the SV-CC meeting, I also brought up the need to review other SV-AC proposals, such as 2250 (LTL VPI). But the consensus was that they are way too busy, and will not get to any more SV-AC reviews before April. Erik Seligman Formal Verification Architect Corporate Design Solutions Design Technology and Solutions Intel Corporation M.S. JF4-402 2111 NE 25th Ave Hillsboro, OR 97124 Phone: (503) 712-3134 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 13 2008 - 09:10:48 PDT