Re: [sv-cc] RE: [sv-sc] VPI and Let, 2414 (also 1728 and 1503)

Hi Erik,

The sv-sc meeting for tomorrow has been cancelled. They plan to
meet next week.

When there have been major changes to the VPI diagrams, the sv-cc
has updated the frame file directly. The diagrams can be quite time
consuming to create. I believe that the Editor has been making
small changes on his own. The frame file that I am referring to
is the one that Stu maintains for the whole LRM. The chapter on
VPI has gone back and forth between the sv-cc and the Editor.

Neil





Seligman, Erik wrote:
> Thanks Abi--
> 
> Dmitry's latest version of 1728 removed all VPI stuff, as it's now in 
> this proposal.
>  
> As for 1503:  Does anyone know how the drawings end up in the LRM?  I'm 
> assuming someone has to redraw them anyway, since most of the ones 
> I've seen in proposal PDFs aren't quite 'professional' quality.   If 
> that's the case, then whoever is redrawing the diagrams will probably 
> have to merge the separate 2414 and 1503 edits.  I don't think that 
> should be hard, since the edits add different things.
>  
> Anyway, tell me how it goes in the CC meeting, and if any issues come up. 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* owner-sv-sc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-sc@server.eda.org] 
> *On Behalf Of *Moorhouse, Abigail
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 08, 2008 12:44 PM
> *To:* sv-sc@server.eda.org; SV-CC
> *Subject:* [sv-sc] VPI and Let, 2414 (also 1728 and 1503)
> 
> hi all
> I uploaded a proposal for the VPI/let changes based on draft 6.
> Charlie, if there is an SV-CC tomorrow then could we put it on the agenda?
> Erik, there are similar and partial drawings in both 1728 and 1503 also, 
> which is potentially very confusing. How should we handle those?
> thanks,
> Abi
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.