Typo in the last message: it is the sv-cc meeting that has been cancelled. Neil Korpusik wrote: > Hi Erik, > > The sv-sc meeting for tomorrow has been cancelled. They plan to > meet next week. > > When there have been major changes to the VPI diagrams, the sv-cc > has updated the frame file directly. The diagrams can be quite time > consuming to create. I believe that the Editor has been making > small changes on his own. The frame file that I am referring to > is the one that Stu maintains for the whole LRM. The chapter on > VPI has gone back and forth between the sv-cc and the Editor. > > Neil > > > > > > Seligman, Erik wrote: >> Thanks Abi-- >> >> Dmitry's latest version of 1728 removed all VPI stuff, as it's now in >> this proposal. >> >> As for 1503: Does anyone know how the drawings end up in the LRM? >> I'm assuming someone has to redraw them anyway, since most of the ones >> I've seen in proposal PDFs aren't quite 'professional' quality. If >> that's the case, then whoever is redrawing the diagrams will probably >> have to merge the separate 2414 and 1503 edits. I don't think that >> should be hard, since the edits add different things. >> >> Anyway, tell me how it goes in the CC meeting, and if any issues come >> up. >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* owner-sv-sc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-sc@server.eda.org] >> *On Behalf Of *Moorhouse, Abigail >> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 08, 2008 12:44 PM >> *To:* sv-sc@server.eda.org; SV-CC >> *Subject:* [sv-sc] VPI and Let, 2414 (also 1728 and 1503) >> >> hi all >> I uploaded a proposal for the VPI/let changes based on draft 6. >> Charlie, if there is an SV-CC tomorrow then could we put it on the >> agenda? >> Erik, there are similar and partial drawings in both 1728 and 1503 >> also, which is potentially very confusing. How should we handle those? >> thanks, >> Abi >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is >> believed to be clean. >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is >> believed to be clean. > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jul 8 15:53:20 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 08 2008 - 15:53:24 PDT