RE: [sv-cc] RE: [sv-champions] Email vote - ending August 13th

Shalom, I agree that the changes are confusing.

John, who put this proposal together, hasn't responded yet,
so let me say what I remember.  In order to simplify the
changes for Stu, John Shields asked him for a copy of
work in progress, and annotated that.  When this first
happened, the copy that he obtained was between draft
5 and draft 6.  You'll see from the note at the top
of the proposal for clause 36 that Stu's existing changes
are supposed to be in green, although I haven't confirmed
that all those changes are in draft 6.

You have observed, correctly I believe, that the strikeouts
are occurring in the "REPLACE" section rather than in the
"WITH" section, and that this is unusual.  In John's defense,
I will note that when we do strikeouts from the diagrams,
we really haven't had any other choice; John seems to
have extended this practice to the text parts as well.

However, I have paged through the proposal for 36 just
now myself and it looks pretty clear that all the
strikeouts marked in red are as the SV-CC intended as
part of the approved proposal.  John seems to have
done that consistently.

Would it be helpful to invite John to comment on specific
instances?

Regards,
Jim Vellenga

--------------------------------------------------------- 
James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
Software Architect                     (FAX) 978-262-6636 
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
270 Billerica Rd
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
"We all work with partial information." 
----------------------------------------------------------  

]-----Original Message-----
]From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On 
]Behalf Of Bresticker, Shalom
]Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 11:34 AM
]To: Bresticker, Shalom; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com; sv-champions@eda.org
]Cc: SV-CC
]Subject: [sv-cc] RE: [sv-champions] Email vote - ending August 13th
]
]Similarly, the diagram for 36.17 Variable select (should be 
]36.18) shows
]"vpiValid" being deleted (red strikeout) in the FROM part, 
]while it does
]exist in Draft 6.
]
]It looks like many of the deletions are being shown in the FROM parts,
]while additions are being shown in the TO parts.
]
]Also, as noted above, some of the section numbers are 
]different in Draft
]6.
]
]Regards,
]Shalom
]
]> -----Original Message-----
]> From: owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org 
]> [mailto:owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of 
]> Bresticker, Shalom
]> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 1:38 PM
]> To: Neil.Korpusik@Sun.COM; sv-champions@server.eda.org
]> Cc: SV-CC
]> Subject: RE: [sv-champions] Email vote - ending August 13th
]> 
]> Something is not clear about Mantis 2226. 
]> 
]> A part of the proposal changes the details of Section 36.16, 
]> the VPI diagram for 36.16.
]> A page numbered 798 has "REPLACE diagram on next page:", 
]> followed by pages 799-802, "WITH diagram on next page:" on 
]> page 803, followed by pages 804-807.
]> 
]> What is not clear to me is that p. 801, in the "FROM" 
]> section, shows details 23 and 26-28 with red-strikeouts, 
]> whereas in Draft 6, the details exist and have not been deleted.
]> 
]> I don't know whether someone thought they were supposed to be 
]> struck out in Draft 6, or there is another proposal for Draft 
]> 7 that strikes them out, or whether this proposal is striking 
]> them out.
]> 
]> Regards,
]> Shalom
]> 
]> > -----Original Message-----
]> > From: owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org 
]> > [mailto:owner-sv-champions@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of 
]> Neil Korpusik
]> > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2008 4:53 AM
]> > To: sv-champions@server.eda.org
]> > Cc: sv-sc@server.eda.org
]> > Subject: [sv-champions] Email vote - ending August 13th
]> > 
]> > SystemVerilog Champions,
]> > 
]> > This is a call for an abbreviated email vote. As we agreed 
]> to in the 
]> > conference call this morning, this email vote will run for 6 days, 
]> > ending on Wednesday, August 13th (7pm PST).
]> > 
]> > 
]> > List of Mantis items for a Champion's email vote:
]> > -------------------------------------------------
]> > 1. 2226  Approve the proposal                  Yes ___ No ___ 
]> > Abstain ___
]> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
]> Intel Israel (74) Limited
]> 
]> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential 
]> material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any 
]> review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If 
]> you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender 
]> and delete all copies.
]> 
]> 
]> --
]> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous 
]> content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
]> 
]> 
]> 
]---------------------------------------------------------------------
]Intel Israel (74) Limited
]
]This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
]the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
]by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
]recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
]
]
]-- 
]This message has been scanned for viruses and
]dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
]believed to be clean.
]
]
]

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.