Re: [sv-cc] Mantis items against Draft 6 which have not yet been reviewed

I reviewed 1898 before -- it made it ok to draft :).

Thx. 
-Bassam

----- Original Message -----
From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org <owner-sv-cc@eda.org>
To: SV-CC <sv-cc@eda.org>
Sent: Thu Aug 14 09:33:06 2008
Subject: [sv-cc] Mantis items against Draft 6 which have not yet been reviewed

Hi Guys,

I'm in the P1800 meeting, and I'm getting some flack because we
haven't reviewed all of the Mantis Items which were implemented
in draft 6. :-)

Here is the list:

Item  Owner    Title
----  -------- ---------------------------------------------------
2262  Steve D. Missing definition in vpi_user.h for vpiIsProtected
2063  Abi      Three minor typos in 36.15, 36.21, and 36.25
2009  Chuck    HDL example shown in detail 3 section 36.14 (Refere
1898  Bassam   Describe the explicit mapping from assertion system
1865  Doug     Inconsistent field definitions for s_vpi_vecval in
1570  Ralph    Clarify legality of 'integer' and 'time' as DPI
1456  Ralph    Clarify, circumscribe restrictions on use of DPI
1385  Chuck    Please document compatibility issues between 1364
1367  Abi      Section 27.11 Ports - the port and port bit objects
1716  Ralph    Clarify handling of DPI formals/actuals with rand

Ralph and Doug, can you review your items, or do I need to find
someone else to review them?  Please let me know.

   -Chas

-- 
Charles Dawson
Senior Engineering Manager
NC-Verilog Team
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
270 Billerica Road
Chelmsford, MA  01824
(978) 262 - 6273
chas@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


-- This message has been scanned for viruses anddangerous content by MailScanner, and isbelieved to be clean.