Hi Charles and Stu, Thanks for the reminders on the Mantis reviews. I reviewed 1865. It has one minor oversight in I.10.1.2: I.10.1.2 Canonical representation of packed arrays /* * DPI representation of packed arrays. * 2-state and 4-state vectors, exactly the same as PLI's avalue/bvalue. */ #ifndef VPI_VECVAL #define VPI_VECVAL typedef struct vpi_vecval { ... In the above, "struct vpi_vecval" needs to be "struct t_vpi_vecval". The Mantis item is already in "Editor" state, so I'm not quite sure what I should do with it. I'm leaving it alone for now. Thanks, Doug > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Dawson > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:33 AM > To: SV-CC > Subject: [sv-cc] Mantis items against Draft 6 which have not yet been reviewed > > Hi Guys, > > I'm in the P1800 meeting, and I'm getting some flack because we > haven't reviewed all of the Mantis Items which were implemented > in draft 6. :-) > > Here is the list: > > Item Owner Title > ---- -------- --------------------------------------------------- > 2262 Steve D. Missing definition in vpi_user.h for vpiIsProtected > 2063 Abi Three minor typos in 36.15, 36.21, and 36.25 > 2009 Chuck HDL example shown in detail 3 section 36.14 (Refere > 1898 Bassam Describe the explicit mapping from assertion system > 1865 Doug Inconsistent field definitions for s_vpi_vecval in > 1570 Ralph Clarify legality of 'integer' and 'time' as DPI > 1456 Ralph Clarify, circumscribe restrictions on use of DPI > 1385 Chuck Please document compatibility issues between 1364 > 1367 Abi Section 27.11 Ports - the port and port bit objects > 1716 Ralph Clarify handling of DPI formals/actuals with rand > > Ralph and Doug, can you review your items, or do I need to find > someone else to review them? Please let me know. > > -Chas > > -- > Charles Dawson > Senior Engineering Manager > NC-Verilog Team > Cadence Design Systems, Inc. > 270 Billerica Road > Chelmsford, MA 01824 > (978) 262 - 6273 > chas@cadence.com > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Aug 14 14:01:44 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 14 2008 - 14:02:02 PDT