Charles, As we discussed, items 1456, 1570 and 1716 are all present in Draft6 and appear to be entirely correct. I may not still have access to Mantis, so please LMK if you need any further action. Ralph -----Original Message----- From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Dawson Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:33 AM To: SV-CC Subject: [sv-cc] Mantis items against Draft 6 which have not yet been reviewed Hi Guys, I'm in the P1800 meeting, and I'm getting some flack because we haven't reviewed all of the Mantis Items which were implemented in draft 6. :-) Here is the list: Item Owner Title ---- -------- --------------------------------------------------- 2262 Steve D. Missing definition in vpi_user.h for vpiIsProtected 2063 Abi Three minor typos in 36.15, 36.21, and 36.25 2009 Chuck HDL example shown in detail 3 section 36.14 (Refere 1898 Bassam Describe the explicit mapping from assertion system 1865 Doug Inconsistent field definitions for s_vpi_vecval in 1570 Ralph Clarify legality of 'integer' and 'time' as DPI 1456 Ralph Clarify, circumscribe restrictions on use of DPI 1385 Chuck Please document compatibility issues between 1364 1367 Abi Section 27.11 Ports - the port and port bit objects 1716 Ralph Clarify handling of DPI formals/actuals with rand Ralph and Doug, can you review your items, or do I need to find someone else to review them? Please let me know. -Chas -- Charles Dawson Senior Engineering Manager NC-Verilog Team Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 270 Billerica Road Chelmsford, MA 01824 (978) 262 - 6273 chas@cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Aug 14 14:29:52 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 14 2008 - 14:30:03 PDT