RE: [sv-cc] Mantis items against Draft 6 which have not yet been reviewed

Doug,

Since it already in editor state, just add a bug note on what needs to be
corrected.  Hopefully there is already a bug note explaining why it was put
back in editor state.

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
+1-503-692-0898
www.sutherland-hdl.com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Warmke, Doug
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:01 PM
> To: Charlie Dawson; SV-CC; stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
> Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Mantis items against Draft 6 which have not yet
> been reviewed
> 
> Hi Charles and Stu,
> 
> Thanks for the reminders on the Mantis reviews.
> I reviewed 1865.  It has one minor oversight in I.10.1.2:
> 
>    I.10.1.2 Canonical representation of packed arrays
>    /*
>     * DPI representation of packed arrays.
>     * 2-state and 4-state vectors, exactly the same as PLI's
> avalue/bvalue.
>     */
>    #ifndef VPI_VECVAL
>    #define VPI_VECVAL
>    typedef struct vpi_vecval {
>    ...
> 
> In the above, "struct vpi_vecval" needs to be "struct t_vpi_vecval".
> 
> The Mantis item is already in "Editor" state, so I'm not quite
> sure what I should do with it.  I'm leaving it alone for now.
> 
> Thanks,
> Doug
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org]
> On Behalf Of Charlie Dawson
> > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:33 AM
> > To: SV-CC
> > Subject: [sv-cc] Mantis items against Draft 6 which have not yet been
> reviewed
> >
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > I'm in the P1800 meeting, and I'm getting some flack because we
> > haven't reviewed all of the Mantis Items which were implemented
> > in draft 6. :-)
> >
> > Here is the list:
> >
> > Item  Owner    Title
> > ----  -------- ---------------------------------------------------
> > 2262  Steve D. Missing definition in vpi_user.h for vpiIsProtected
> > 2063  Abi      Three minor typos in 36.15, 36.21, and 36.25
> > 2009  Chuck    HDL example shown in detail 3 section 36.14 (Refere
> > 1898  Bassam   Describe the explicit mapping from assertion system
> > 1865  Doug     Inconsistent field definitions for s_vpi_vecval in
> > 1570  Ralph    Clarify legality of 'integer' and 'time' as DPI
> > 1456  Ralph    Clarify, circumscribe restrictions on use of DPI
> > 1385  Chuck    Please document compatibility issues between 1364
> > 1367  Abi      Section 27.11 Ports - the port and port bit objects
> > 1716  Ralph    Clarify handling of DPI formals/actuals with rand
> >
> > Ralph and Doug, can you review your items, or do I need to find
> > someone else to review them?  Please let me know.
> >
> >    -Chas
> >
> > --
> > Charles Dawson
> > Senior Engineering Manager
> > NC-Verilog Team
> > Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
> > 270 Billerica Road
> > Chelmsford, MA  01824
> > (978) 262 - 6273
> > chas@cadence.com
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.