My apologies: I was looking only at the first diagram of the pair. The properties are indeed there. Regards, Jim Vellenga --------------------------------------------------------- James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381 Software Architect (FAX) 978-262-6636 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com 270 Billerica Rd Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 "We all work with partial information." ---------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ From: Jim Vellenga Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 3:40 PM To: 'Shields, John'; sv-cc@eda.org Cc: sv-champions@eda.org; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com; Karen Pieper; Bresticker, Shalom; stuart@sutherland-hdl.com Subject: RE: [sv-cc] mantis 2226 action completed John, help me out. How did you find out that named events and named event arrays must be static objects? I see that you removed the vpiAutomatic and vpiAllocScheme properties from the proposal for those types. Regards, Jim Vellenga --------------------------------------------------------- James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381 Software Architect (FAX) 978-262-6636 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com 270 Billerica Rd Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 "We all work with partial information." ---------------------------------------------------------- ________________________________ From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Shields, John Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 2:07 PM To: sv-cc@eda.org Cc: sv-champions@eda.org; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com; Karen Pieper; Bresticker, Shalom; stuart@sutherland-hdl.com Subject: [sv-cc] mantis 2226 action completed Hi Everyone, I have completed my action on 2226. I changed it to review so that I could revise files. I've removed all the draft6 revisions and added the changes baselined to draft7. All the champion and reviewer feedback has been incorporated. The Champions and the Working Group have entrusted SV-CC to to this composition work and you have entrusted that all to me. In a perfect world, I would ask Charlie to close 2226 and he in turn would ask Neil to remark it approved and turn it over to Stu. I think it would be helpful to have a quick review for composition errors and to allow the friendly amendments to be seen in context. I leave the next action to Charlie to ask for review or close the item. Because of the number of files, I have packaged them in 3 zip files. fm-clauses-mantis2226.zip contain full framemaker files for each clause (except annex C). This is what Stu asked for to minimize his effort. My notes on that are: 1) Some diagrams I could show deletions, others the real estate for the deletion was reused and one sees only the addition. 2) The annexes need normal editor work. I did not have Annex C from Stu at all, but the edit is trivial. The other 2 annexes require some minor numbering. fm-changes-only-mantis2226.zip contains framemaker files representing only what has changed in a minimal fashion suitable for efficient review. pdf-changes-only-mantis2226.zip contains pdfs of those. The framemaker change only versions were necessary(to me) for composition and I used them to create the complete clauses. Normally, Stu would start with them. It is his option to look at them and validate that the edits to the full clauses were made accurately. I used paragraph tags properly in the full clauses, but the change-only requires tag mods to insure that the numbering matched the document. Regards, John -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Sep 29 12:43:09 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 29 2008 - 12:43:13 PDT