RE: [sv-cc] mantis 2226 action completed

John-
I second Jim's assessment- nice work.  Here are my correction inputs to
Parts 1 -> 3 (minor  & word-smithing only):
 
In "38.36.1 Simulation event callbacks" :
 
    1) Change in first sentence starts with:   "such as values changes"
"values" should be "value" (singular).
 
    2) Paragraph describing cb_data_p->obj has a sentence containing:
             ... "assigned a handle to class typespec object."
        Please insert "a" so it reads:
             ... "assigned a handle to a class typespec object."
 
    3) In paragraph beginning "For a cbReclainObj", the final sentence:
            "Navigation using this handle as a reference or registration
of callbacks associated with this handle is undefined."
 
        ... should be worded better for clarity. I would suggest:
            "Using this handle as a reference for purposes of navigation
or registering callbacks is undefined."
 
Regards,
Chuck


________________________________

	From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On Behalf
Of Shields, John
	Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 2:07 PM
	To: sv-cc@eda.org
	Cc: sv-champions@eda.org; Neil.Korpusik@sun.com; Karen Pieper;
Bresticker, Shalom; stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
	Subject: [sv-cc] mantis 2226 action completed
	
	

	Hi Everyone,

	 

	I have completed my action on 2226.  I changed it to review so
that I could revise files.  I've removed all the draft6 revisions and
added the changes baselined to draft7.   All the champion and reviewer
feedback has been incorporated. The Champions and the Working Group have
entrusted SV-CC to to this composition work and you have entrusted that
all to me.  In a perfect world, I would ask Charlie to close 2226 and he
in turn would ask Neil to remark it approved and turn it over to Stu.  I
think it would be helpful to have a quick review for composition errors
and to allow the friendly amendments to be seen in context.  I leave the
next action to Charlie to ask for review or close the item.

	 

	Because of the number of files, I have packaged them in 3 zip
files.  fm-clauses-mantis2226.zip contain full framemaker files for each
clause (except annex C).  This is what Stu asked for to minimize his
effort.  My notes on that are:

	 

	1) Some diagrams I could show deletions, others the real estate
for the deletion was reused and one sees only the addition.

	2) The annexes need normal editor work.  I did not have Annex C
from Stu at all, but the edit is trivial.  The other 2 annexes require
some minor numbering.

	 

	 

	fm-changes-only-mantis2226.zip contains framemaker files
representing only what has changed in a minimal fashion suitable for
efficient review. pdf-changes-only-mantis2226.zip contains pdfs of
those.  The framemaker change only versions were necessary(to me) for
composition and I used them to create the complete clauses.  Normally,
Stu would start with them.  It is his option to look at them and
validate that the edits to the full clauses were made accurately.  I
used paragraph tags properly in the full clauses, but the change-only
requires tag mods to insure that the numbering matched the document.

	
	Regards, John


	-- 
	This message has been scanned for viruses and 
	dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>
, and is 
	believed to be clean. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.