Shalom, It looks to me like Manits item 2240 is not really a duplicate of 1946, since 1946 deals with the size of string variables while 2240 deals with the size of string literals. If you agree, can we replace the "Relationship" by "related to" rather than "duplicate"? Regards, Jim Vellenga --------------------------------------------------------- James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381 Software Architect (FAX) 978-262-6636 Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com 270 Billerica Rd Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 "We all work with partial information." ---------------------------------------------------------- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Oct 30 06:31:49 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Oct 30 2008 - 06:32:07 PDT