[sv-cc] RE: 2240 not a duplicate of 1946

I agree, you're correct. I replaced it.

Thanks,
Shalom 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Vellenga [mailto:vellenga@cadence.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 3:30 PM
> To: Bresticker, Shalom
> Cc: SV-CC
> Subject: 2240 not a duplicate of 1946
> 
> Shalom,
> 
> It looks to me like Manits item 2240 is not really a 
> duplicate of 1946, since 1946 deals with the size of string 
> variables while 2240 deals with the size of string literals.
> 
> If you agree, can we replace the "Relationship" by "related 
> to" rather than "duplicate"?
> 
> Regards,
> Jim Vellenga
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------- 
> James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
> Software Architect                     (FAX) 978-262-6636 
> Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
> 270 Billerica Rd
> Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
> "We all work with partial information." 
> ---------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.