RE: [sv-cc] Another Draft 8 typo

The numbers for cbCreateObj, cbReclaimObj and cbEndOfObject actually
don't work since they conflict with Assertion callback numbers
cbAssertionStart and cbAssertionSuccess.

This one we can't (according to the rules ) get changed since we missed
this in Draft 7 

Again, I recommend that we at least agree on numbers. My suggestions:

#define cbCreateObj           659
#define cbReclaimObj          660
#define cbEndOfObject         661

Abi

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Moorhouse, Abigail
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 2:05 PM
To: SV-CC
Subject: [sv-cc] Another Draft 8 typo

(My last one spammed rather further than I meant to).

This one is SV-CC only

In Draft 8 sv_vpi_user.h page 1202/1235 cbReclaimObj and cbEndOfObject
have both been defined to the same number - 607. I don't believe that
this represents the original intention.

Again, I'd appreciate a double-check from someone before Mantising it.

Abi

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.