Re: [sv-cc] Another Draft 8 typo

Hi Abi,

We will take the include files and actually try them with IUS and report
any issues we find.  Please do the same with ModelSim.  If someone could
try it with VCS, that would be good too.

All of these kinds of issues have to be addressed either now or as a
ballot comment, so let's just focus on finding them for now.

   -Chas


Moorhouse, Abigail wrote:
> 
> The numbers for cbCreateObj, cbReclaimObj and cbEndOfObject actually
> don't work since they conflict with Assertion callback numbers
> cbAssertionStart and cbAssertionSuccess.
> 
> This one we can't (according to the rules ) get changed since we missed
> this in Draft 7 
> 
> Again, I recommend that we at least agree on numbers. My suggestions:
> 
> #define cbCreateObj           659
> #define cbReclaimObj          660
> #define cbEndOfObject         661
> 
> Abi
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org] On
> Behalf Of Moorhouse, Abigail
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 2:05 PM
> To: SV-CC
> Subject: [sv-cc] Another Draft 8 typo
> 
> (My last one spammed rather further than I meant to).
> 
> This one is SV-CC only
> 
> In Draft 8 sv_vpi_user.h page 1202/1235 cbReclaimObj and cbEndOfObject
> have both been defined to the same number - 607. I don't believe that
> this represents the original intention.
> 
> Again, I'd appreciate a double-check from someone before Mantising it.
> 
> Abi
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Charles Dawson
Senior Engineering Manager
NC-Verilog Team
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
270 Billerica Road
Chelmsford, MA  01824
(978) 262 - 6273
chas@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.