Hi all, I am just wondering why do we explicitly say that the type specification for a string parameter is mandatory? Why can't we allow the type to be derived based upon the default expression. Do you think we could remove this restriction in 3.2.1 and just mention that if no type is specified and the parameter is assigned a default value of a string, then the type of the parameter will be string and it will be an error if the parameter is overridden with any numerical value. This is causing me some problems at the moment as some digital simulators that I am using allow string parameters to be defined without the type. In fact if I understand digital correctly (2005) you can't actually have a string parameter (only string registers) but that is a separate issue. Dave -- ===================================== -- David Miller -- Design Technology (Austin) -- Freescale Semiconductor -- Ph : 512 996-7377 Fax: x7755 =====================================Received on Tue Nov 14 09:22:24 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 14 2006 - 09:22:34 PST