RE: [sv-cc] Minutes for the SV-CC Conference Call @ 22-Apr-2003

Subject: RE: [sv-cc] Minutes for the SV-CC Conference Call @ 22-Apr-2003
From: Stuart Swan (stuart@cadence.com)
Date: Thu Apr 24 2003 - 14:18:06 PDT

• Next message: Vassilios.Gerousis@Infineon.Com: "[sv-cc] SystemVerilog 3.1 LRM Passed all Committees"
• Previous message: Francoise Martinolle: "[sv-cc] Fwd: [sv-bc] Cadence Negative Ballot Comment on SystemVerilog 3.1"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Rohleder: "[sv-cc] Minutes for the SV-CC Conference Call @ 22-Apr-2003"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>
> I currently have a renewed enthusiasm for SystemC. I think it
> was a big mistake not
> to go with C++ syntax for the class mechanisms of SV. Just
> building the bridges from
> SV 3.0 to C++ (SystemC) would probably have been less effort
> and more useful than
> a lot of what has been added for 3.1.
>
> Regards,
> Kev.
>
>

Ah Kevin, where were you when I needed you... ;)

Stuart

• Next message: Vassilios.Gerousis@Infineon.Com: "[sv-cc] SystemVerilog 3.1 LRM Passed all Committees"
• Previous message: Francoise Martinolle: "[sv-cc] Fwd: [sv-bc] Cadence Negative Ballot Comment on SystemVerilog 3.1"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Rohleder: "[sv-cc] Minutes for the SV-CC Conference Call @ 22-Apr-2003"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Apr 24 2003 - 14:19:19 PDT