RE: [sv-cc] PTF items and a proposal for PTF 342.

My take on things...

Everything passed by the PTF or ETF going forward needs to also be confirmed by the P1800. Charles is proposing to move the PTF database on boyd.com over to the eda.org database to simplify tracking.

We do not need to reenter already passed issues from the PTF or ETF into the eda.org database. As Shalom noted he has already incorporated all of those.

I hope this helps,

Karen

At 11:09 AM 11/16/2004 -0500, Jim Vellenga wrote:
>If a proposal for 1364 was already approved by the
>previous 1364 body, does it have to get reentered
>as a V-PTF item?
>
>What about those which were approved by the PTF but
>not yet by the parent 1364 body?
>
>Regards,
>Jim V.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------
>James H. Vellenga 978-262-6381
>Engineering Director (FAX) 978-262-6636
>Cadence Design Systems, Inc. vellenga@cadence.com
>270 Billerica Rd
>Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179
>"We all work with partial information."
>----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>] -----Original Message-----
>] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On
>] Behalf Of Charlie Dawson
>] Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 9:55 AM
>] To: SV-CC
>] Subject: [sv-cc] PTF items and a proposal for PTF 342.
>]
>] Hi All,
>]
>] It looked for a while there that our proposal to create new
>] Mantis Issues for
>] the PTF items which we wanted to work on had been nixed.
>] Last week Karen
>] and John decided they liked the idea after all. So, we now have a new
>] category called V-PTF. I have added the first item there: 303 which
>] corresponds to PTF 342.
>]
>] Here is what I would like people to do. If you want to make
>] a proposal for
>] a PTF item, add it in this category, and include in the title
>] the original
>] PTF item number and title. Then in the description add a
>] link to the old
>] data base.
>]
>] Item 303 has been setup this way, and can be used as an example.
>]
>] Finally, I have added a new proposal for 303 which
>] incorporates all of the
>] feedback from PTF 342's last proposal and I have done another
>] pass over
>] the LRM looking for additional changes that would be
>] necessary as a result
>] of this change.
>]
>] I then put all of this into the approved format. I think we
>] have a complete
>] and thorough proposal at this point.
>]
>] -Chas
>]
>] --
>] Charles Dawson
>] Senior Engineering Manager
>] NC-Verilog Team
>] Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
>] 270 Billerica Road
>] Chelmsford, MA 01824
>] (978) 262 - 6273
>] chas@cadence.com
>]
>]
>]
>]
Received on Tue Nov 16 11:11:25 2004