The SV-CC will meet tomorrow and look at this set of changes. -Chas -------- Original Message -------- Subject: P1800 instructions for editor - mantis 734, 709, 711 and 712 Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 18:51:09 -0700 From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik@sun.com> Reply-To: Neil.Korpusik@sun.com To: chas CC: Mehdi Mohtashemi <Mehdi.Mohtashemi@synopsys.com>, Arturo Salz <Arturo.Salz@synopsys.com>, Stuart Sutherland <Stuart.Sutherland@sun.com>, Karen Pieper <Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com> References: <42850689.4010702@Sun.COM> <428508FE.10602@cadence.com> Hi Chas, Arturo pointed out that Mantis item 712 also touches the same text of the LRM. I have merged the text portion of that mantis item into this same file. For mantis item 712 I made the same 2 wording changes in order to make it consistent with the other paragraphs. "is specifically for" ---> "provides" "for user code" ---> "PLI application routines" Each of these text substitutions has been approved for a subset of the paragraphs by one of the committees. The svec approved the following in mantis items 709 and 711 (but not 712 nor 734). "is specifically for" ---> "provides" The svcc approved the following in mantis item 734 (but not in 712). "for user code" ---> "PLI application routines" It would probably be good if the svcc voted on these additional changes to ensure that all of them were approved by one of the committees. Note that there are a couple of other changes mentioned in mantis item 712 that are not shown in the attached document. They modify table 15-3 and figure 15-1. The modification to table 15-3 supercedes svcc mantis item 372. Neil Charles Dawson wrote: > Hi Neil et All, > > I took a look at these changes, and they seem okay to me. I will bring it > up at our next SV-CC meeting (Wednesday) anyway. I do want to point out that > Mantis Item 372 also deals with this section. > > -Chas > > > Neil Korpusik wrote: > >>Hi Chas, Mehdi, Arturo, Karen and Stu, >> >>Both the svec and the svcc have approved mantis items that touch the same >>paragraphs of the P1800 LRM. >> >> svec - mantis 709 and 711 >> svcc - mantis 734 >> >>Since mantis item 734 is the one with the highest number, Stu would typically >>apply this set of changes last. If he uses this algorithm some of the changes >>contained in mantis 709 and 711 will be lost. >> >>Attached is a pdf file that contains the text that should result after >>merging all three of these mantis items. >> >>After merging the text for these I noticed there there were a few places where >>wordsmithing done in one paragraph was not made to the same phrase in another. >>I took the liberty of making all of these consistent. There were only two >>phrases affected by this change: >> >> "is specifically for" --> "provides" >> "allows for" --> "allows" >> >>Other than those minor changes this should be an exact merge of the three >>mantis items. >> >>I am expecting that we will all be in agreement on this and that it won't be >>necessary to hold a joint conference call with the svec and svcc to approve >>this. >> >>Let me know what you think. This merged pdf may need to be added to one of >>the existing mantis items (734?). >> >>Neil >> >> >>BTW - I will be on vacation for the rest of the day and won't see any email >>until Monday. >> >> > > > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Korpusik Tel: 408-720-4852 Staff Engineer Fax: 408-720-4850 Frontend Technologies - ASICs & Processors (FTAP) Sun Microsystems email: neil.korpusik@sun.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Charles Dawson Senior Engineering Manager NC-Verilog Team Cadence Design Systems, Inc. 270 Billerica Road Chelmsford, MA 01824 (978) 262 - 6273 chas@cadence.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 17 2005 - 18:55:50 PDT