RE: [sv-cc] [Fwd: P1800 instructions for editor - mantis 734, 709, 711 and 712]

Neil,

Was the Pre-postponed region also added to the bulleted
list that serves as the third paragraph of 15.3?  I didn't
see that in the proposal for 712.

In the paragraph about the Postponed region, I believe
that the "Observe" region should actually be the "Observed"
region.

In the NOTE attached to the paragraph about the Post-observed
region, the spelling of "schcedule" should be corrected.

In the paragraph after that, should "Pre-Postponed" be
written as "Pre-postponed" instead for consistency with
other regions that have prefixed names?  I.e., don't
capitalize the first "P" in the suffixed "postponed"?

I notice that the proposal for 712 updated Table 15-3
so that cbEndOfSimTime now points to the "Pre-Postponed"
region (should that also be "Pre-postponed"), but that
cbReadOnlySynch still maps to the "Postponed" region.
Is that intentional?

Regards,
Jim Vellenga

--------------------------------------------------------- 
James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
Engineering Director                   (FAX) 978-262-6636 
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
270 Billerica Rd 
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 
"We all work with partial information." 
---------------------------------------------------------- 
  
 

] -----Original Message-----
] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On 
] Behalf Of Charlie Dawson
] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 9:56 PM
] To: Neil.Korpusik@sun.com
] Cc: SV-CC
] Subject: [sv-cc] [Fwd: P1800 instructions for editor - mantis 
] 734, 709, 711 and 712]
] 
] The SV-CC will meet tomorrow and look at this set of changes.
] 
]    -Chas
] 
] 
] -------- Original Message --------
] Subject: P1800 instructions for editor - mantis  734, 709, 711 and 712
] Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 18:51:09 -0700
] From: Neil Korpusik <Neil.Korpusik@sun.com>
] Reply-To: Neil.Korpusik@sun.com
] To: chas
] CC: Mehdi Mohtashemi <Mehdi.Mohtashemi@synopsys.com>,        
] Arturo Salz <Arturo.Salz@synopsys.com>,        Stuart 
] Sutherland <Stuart.Sutherland@sun.com>,        Karen Pieper 
] <Karen.Pieper@synopsys.com>
] References: <42850689.4010702@Sun.COM> <428508FE.10602@cadence.com>
] 
] Hi Chas,
] 
] Arturo pointed out that Mantis item 712 also touches the same 
] text of the
] LRM. I have merged the text portion of that mantis item into 
] this same file.
] For mantis item 712 I made the same 2 wording changes in 
] order to make it
] consistent with the other paragraphs.
] 
]      "is specifically for" ---> "provides"
]      "for user code"  ---> "PLI application routines"
] 
] 
] Each of these text substitutions has been approved for a subset of the
] paragraphs by one of the committees.
] 
] The svec approved the following in mantis items 709 and 711
] (but not 712 nor 734).
] 
]      "is specifically for" ---> "provides"
] 
] The svcc approved the following in mantis item 734 (but not in 712).
] 
]      "for user code"  ---> "PLI application routines"
] 
] It would probably be good if the svcc voted on these 
] additional changes to
] ensure that all of them were approved by one of the committees.
] 
] Note that there are a couple of other changes mentioned in 
] mantis item 712
] that are not shown in the attached document. They modify 
] table 15-3 and
] figure 15-1. The modification to table 15-3 supercedes svcc 
] mantis item 372.
] 
] 
] Neil
] 
] 
] 
] Charles Dawson wrote:
]  > Hi Neil et All,
]  >
]  > I took a look at these changes, and they seem okay to me.  
] I will bring it
]  > up at our next SV-CC meeting (Wednesday) anyway.  I do 
] want to point out that
]  > Mantis Item 372 also deals with this section.
]  >
]  >    -Chas
]  >
]  >
]  > Neil Korpusik wrote:
]  >
]  >>Hi Chas, Mehdi, Arturo, Karen and Stu,
]  >>
]  >>Both the svec and the svcc have approved mantis items that 
] touch the same
]  >>paragraphs of the P1800 LRM.
]  >>
]  >>   svec - mantis 709 and 711
]  >>   svcc - mantis 734
]  >>
]  >>Since mantis item 734 is the one with the highest number, 
] Stu would typically
]  >>apply this set of changes last. If he uses this algorithm 
] some of the changes
]  >>contained in mantis 709 and 711 will be lost.
]  >>
]  >>Attached is a pdf file that contains the text that should 
] result after
]  >>merging all three of these mantis items.
]  >>
]  >>After merging the text for these I noticed there there 
] were a few places where
]  >>wordsmithing done in one paragraph was not made to the 
] same phrase in another.
]  >>I took the liberty of making all of these consistent. 
] There were only two
]  >>phrases affected by this change:
]  >>
]  >>   "is specifically for" --> "provides"
]  >>   "allows for" --> "allows"
]  >>
]  >>Other than those minor changes this should be an exact 
] merge of the three
]  >>mantis items.
]  >>
]  >>I am expecting that we will all be in agreement on this 
] and that it won't be
]  >>necessary to hold a joint conference call with the svec 
] and svcc to approve
]  >>this.
]  >>
]  >>Let me know what you think. This merged pdf may need to be 
] added to one of
]  >>the existing mantis items (734?).
]  >>
]  >>Neil
]  >>
]  >>
]  >>BTW - I will be on vacation for the rest of the day and 
] won't see any email
]  >>until Monday.
]  >>
]  >>
]  >
]  >
]  >
] 
] -- 
] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
] Neil Korpusik                                     Tel: 408-720-4852
] Staff Engineer                                    Fax: 408-720-4850
] Frontend Technologies - ASICs & Processors (FTAP)
] Sun Microsystems
] email: neil.korpusik@sun.com
] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
] 
] 
] 
] -- 
] Charles Dawson
] Senior Engineering Manager
] NC-Verilog Team
] Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
] 270 Billerica Road
] Chelmsford, MA  01824
] (978) 262 - 6273
] chas@cadence.com
] 
] 
]