RE: [sv-cc] New version of #736 proposal uploaded

That's fine, Doug.  I have deleted my "in lieu" contributions from
Mantis.

Some notes:

-- I think you meant the first section number to be
"F.7.4" rather than "E.7.4".

-- In the final note, "With array of string arguments"
was supposed to be "With arrays ..." or "With an array ..."?
And "all array" was probably supposed to be "all arrays".

-- In the first paragraph of F.7.10.1, perhaps "are also
represented" should be "shall be represented"?

Regards,
Jim 

--------------------------------------------------------- 
James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
Engineering Director                   (FAX) 978-262-6636 
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
270 Billerica Rd 
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 
"We all work with partial information." 
---------------------------------------------------------- 
  
 

] -----Original Message-----
] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On 
] Behalf Of Warmke, Doug
] Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 4:21 PM
] To: SV-CC
] Subject: [sv-cc] New version of #736 proposal uploaded
] 
] Hi All,
] 
] I uploaded a new version of item #736's proposal.
] All references to "the user" were changed to slightly
] more formal wording regarding "the DPI C application".
] 
] I also took advantage of this opportunity to add a
] clarification about how aggregate arguments containing
] string members are handled.  There is nothing new in
] there, just clarifications to existing specifications.
] 
] Take a look!
]     http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000736
] 
] Regards,
] Doug
] 
] P.S.  Jim, I couldn't handle that FrameMaker attachment.
]       I saved my MS Word doc as "HTML, Filtered", which I
]       understand is viewable in Firefox, IE, and NetScape.
]       Please let me know if you still have trouble with it.
] 
]