RE: [sv-cc] New version of #736 proposal uploaded

Thanks Jim.
I incorporated all your comments and they are now in SV-736-2.htm.

See you!
Doug 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Vellenga [mailto:vellenga@cadence.com] 
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:27 AM
> To: Warmke, Doug; SV-CC
> Subject: RE: [sv-cc] New version of #736 proposal uploaded
> 
> That's fine, Doug.  I have deleted my "in lieu" contributions from
> Mantis.
> 
> Some notes:
> 
> -- I think you meant the first section number to be
> "F.7.4" rather than "E.7.4".
> 
> -- In the final note, "With array of string arguments"
> was supposed to be "With arrays ..." or "With an array ..."?
> And "all array" was probably supposed to be "all arrays".
> 
> -- In the first paragraph of F.7.10.1, perhaps "are also
> represented" should be "shall be represented"?
> 
> Regards,
> Jim 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------- 
> James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
> Engineering Director                   (FAX) 978-262-6636 
> Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
> 270 Billerica Rd 
> Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 
> "We all work with partial information." 
> ---------------------------------------------------------- 
>   
>  
> 
> ] -----Original Message-----
> ] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On 
> ] Behalf Of Warmke, Doug
> ] Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 4:21 PM
> ] To: SV-CC
> ] Subject: [sv-cc] New version of #736 proposal uploaded
> ] 
> ] Hi All,
> ] 
> ] I uploaded a new version of item #736's proposal.
> ] All references to "the user" were changed to slightly
> ] more formal wording regarding "the DPI C application".
> ] 
> ] I also took advantage of this opportunity to add a
> ] clarification about how aggregate arguments containing
> ] string members are handled.  There is nothing new in
> ] there, just clarifications to existing specifications.
> ] 
> ] Take a look!
> ]     http://www.eda.org/svdb/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000736
> ] 
> ] Regards,
> ] Doug
> ] 
> ] P.S.  Jim, I couldn't handle that FrameMaker attachment.
> ]       I saved my MS Word doc as "HTML, Filtered", which I
> ]       understand is viewable in Firefox, IE, and NetScape.
> ]       Please let me know if you still have trouble with it.
> ] 
> ] 
>