RE: [sv-cc] Updated SV-CC Mantis Items

I have submitted the Handle lifetime Mantis item, 2226. It has a content
proposal, that is, I have tried to indicate where the changes to the LRM
will be, but I have not yet fully formatted them.

I know this will be contentious and I have found it a very difficult
topic. As a result, I have tried to avoid making LRM commitments in this
area where we don't fully understand the implications, especially on
kernel performance. 

In spite of all this, Charlie suggested uploading something so we have
something to discuss, so here it is. If people hate the approach I have
taken, and want to suggest something different, at least we will learn
that.
Abi 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@server.eda.org] On
Behalf Of Charlie Dawson
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 12:34 PM
To: SV-CC
Subject: [sv-cc] Updated SV-CC Mantis Items

Hi All,

I have updated the SV-CC Mantis Items to reflect what we intend to work
on for this ballot draft.  All Items which are related to one of the
topics which we want to address has been given a priority of Urgent.
All others have had their priority set to Normal.  I also set to Urgent
all Items for which we already have a proposal.

I am still expecting several Mantis Items to be filed:

     - Typed parameters (Francoise)
     - Handle lifetime (Abi)
     - Values with delays on dynamic objects (chas)
     - VPI causing new objects to come into existence (Abi)

When you file these, please be sure to set the priority to Urgent.

If you file an Item on some other topic which is not necessarily for
this ballot draft, please set the priority lower than Urgent.  Thanks.

I also believe I have assigned all of the Urgent Items appropriately.

If you find any mistakes, please let me know.  Thanks.

   -Chas

--
Charles Dawson
Senior Engineering Manager
NC-Verilog Team
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
270 Billerica Road
Chelmsford, MA  01824
(978) 262 - 6273
chas@cadence.com


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.