[sv-cc] some responses to some comments

I am reading the annotated mantis document with Arturo/Vitaly comments and I have further comments:

for comment [Art33} and response comment [VY34R33]:
[FM33]: I agree with Arturo, if a DPI-OO imported class method cannot be declared pure virtual
and REFER to a pure virtual method, WHO and HOw is going to check that. This needs to be specified.

For comment [Art37] and response comment [VY38R37]
[FM37]: The class C is imported by reference, I assume it potentially has some inheritance in the foreign language, right?
Snce it is imported by reference, it also imports some methodes declared int he foreign language class declaration by reference:
here the exmaple shows that that the function get_address is imported.
Now we declared the import class C as extending an SV "base_class". Have we now defined 2 difference inheritance trees?
If we did, I may have further questions/issues related to name conflict resolution.
I think we need a section that describes the casting of such classes.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.